
- Forum
- ERP
- Oracle Apps
- Wrong Inventory Receiving
Wrong Inventory Receiving
This is a discussion on Wrong Inventory Receiving within the Oracle Apps forums, part of the ERP category; Hi, We are working in oracle applications 11i. Oracle Inventory module user has complained that she has received a PO ...
-
Wrong Inventory Receiving
Hi,
We are working in oracle applications 11i. Oracle Inventory module user has complained that she has received a PO that have 5 lines twice and entered. I am not sure what went wrong. But I have found in the rcv_transactions table 14 records of that PO with transaction types: 3 DELIVER, 7 RECEIVE and 4 TRANSFER.
From the applications Transactions-> Receiving->Receiving Transactions: for that PO I have found 4 records 2 of them (quantities 15 and 7) with destination type Expense with the parent type transfer and the same 2 lines (again 15&17) with Transation Type Multiple within line 15 i have 3 lines each with a quantity 5, all 3 of them with destination type Expense and parent type Transfer. and within the second line with quantity 7 I have 2 line with quantities 4 and three and destination type expenses.
Please, I need someone to guide me to the problem as I cannot figure out what's wrong.
-
Hi,
I'll try to elaborate more.
The PO 1295 has 5 lines:
line 1 quantity is 15
line 2 quantity is 7
line 3 quantity is 2
line 4 quantity is 1
line 5 quantity is 1
This PO has 2 receipts 1311 and 1316
receipt 1311 transactions are :
receive and transfer for line 1 -15
receive and transfer for line 2 -7
receive and deliver for line 3
receive and deliver for line 4
receive and deliver for line 5
receipt no 1316 transactions are :
receive and transfer for line 1again 15
receive and transfer for line 2 again 7
now, our problem is with the first two lines:
I don't know how the user made a receive and transfer transaction and I want to reverse it (may be twice) and do a receive deliver transaction
What shall I do?
«
Oracle Apps Report Registration steps by example plz!!!
|
Context Sensitive DFF and Code changes
»

Reply With Quote





