The paradigm which is associated with OOAD is connected to many of the programming languages which are classified as being third generation. Two of these languages are COBOL as well as Fortran. The procedure constructs for these programming languages allow for abstraction mechanisms which are highly robust.
Behavior which is highly advanced may be taken from units which are much more basic. The fundamental structure for programming languages such as Algo allow for syntactic support, particularly for layers which are arbitrary.
Once these are applied to the creation of systems, then the abstraction mechanism will place a heavy emphasis on behavioral attributes. Behavior will be split into subcomponents, allowing for behavioral units which can be implemented.
The removal for sequential control via Structured Analysis was something which was considered to be state of the art. Many invocations for procedures have been successfully broken down into descriptions which are related to interacting processes.
The connections which exist among the processes are referred to as being the flow of data, and the generalization for the data may be passed dependent on various invocations. The processes must be responsible for symbolizing the parallelism that exist in reality.
However, the usage of these processes will create mapping issues, and it will be necessary for one to transfer for descriptions which are high level into implementations which are highly sequential. The object oriented paradigm has to deal with this very challenge.
The beginning for the process modeling is based on the behavior which exists in the desired system. This means that structured analysis will largely make use of the top down method.
The high level descriptions for processes will usually target things which are system specific, and this means that it is not likely that they will be used again for systems which are similar. Because of this, the description which is obtained will generally be especially fit for the task which is at hand.
Object oriented software development must be responsible for dealing with the disadvantages that result from custom solutions. At every point in development, the components for the solutions may be connected which can generalize at a higher level than simply the local needs.
Additional Aspect for Object Oriented Development
You must keep in mind that any given object will be responsible for maintaining its very own state.
A function which is dependent on history may be realized much more smoothly and independently for its own runtime environment, especially in comparison to languages which are procedural.
One thing that I should also point out is that inheritance offers the abstraction mechanism which will permit the factoring of the redundancies.
At this point, it is hard to determine whether or not applicability ranges are truly distinct, even though object oriented methods may have a specific edge for the systems which are distributed. The structured analysis must be responsible for thriving on the decomposition of processes, as well as the data flows.
Even if you are able to identify a domain for tasks where the decomposition of the processes is not the correct action, where will the objects be properly recognized?
In addition to this, you must be able to identify the task where you do not need to recognize the objects, where the decomposition of the processes will be more natural. Both cases are possible.
Processes and the objects will run hand in hand once you begin to see them as focusing on the dynamic rather than static view for the behavior which underlies them. These two paradigms are distinct within the sequence for which attention is paid for both the static and the dynamic dimensions. The dynamics will be emphasized inside the paradigm that is structured, and the statics may be determined by the object oriented paradigm.
The software development industry has invested a great deal in Structured Analysis, and they have also placed a heavy emphasis on Structured Design. Many software developers have raised the question of whether or not it is possible to use a combination of both the components based on the structured development method, and the object oriented development method. Most experts have denied the ability to combine these processes.